In what situation does Comte’s positivism claim observations are more valid?

Comte’s positivism asserts that valid observations are strengthened when multiple observers reach a consensus. This approach emphasizes the importance of objective data gathering and verification, distancing itself from subjective interpretations or personal biases that can arise from isolated observations or introspective accounts. By promoting a consensus among observers, Comte aims to enhance the reliability and credibility of findings. This collective validation is critical in scientific inquiry, as it reduces the influence of individual error or bias, thus leading to more reliable and universally accepted conclusions. This principle reflects the positivist belief in the need for systematic and empirical methods in the pursuit of knowledge.