What did many philosophers of Parmenides' time value more than sensory experience?

Many philosophers of Parmenides' time valued innate knowledge more than sensory experience because they believed that true knowledge is not derived from the senses, which are often deceiving and unreliable. Parmenides argued that change is an illusion and that reality is unchanging and can only be known through rational thought and reasoning. This perspective emphasized the importance of understanding the essence of being and existence, which philosophers contended could be grasped through innate ideas or knowledge that exist independently of sensory input. This belief placed a higher esteem on abstract reasoning and intellectual insight over the direct observation of the physical world.

In contrast, practical knowledge, observable phenomena, and emotional intelligence do not align with the philosophical stance of valuing inner knowledge derived from reasoning and logic over empirical evidence from the senses during this historical period.