What philosophical stance does Zeno's paradox support?

Zeno's paradox primarily supports rationalism, which emphasizes the role of reason and logic in understanding the world rather than sensory experience or empirical evidence. Zeno's paradoxes, particularly those involving motion (such as the famous Achilles and the tortoise paradox), challenge our intuitive understanding of space and time, requiring a logical analysis of concepts like infinity and continuity.

Rationalism posits that knowledge can be gained through reasoned argument and intellectual deduction. In the case of Zeno's paradox, he used logical reasoning to draw conclusions that defy empirical observation. For instance, while empirically it seems that Achilles should be able to overtake the tortoise given enough speed, Zeno's logical framework shows that through an infinite number of steps, this action becomes seemingly impossible. This reliance on abstract reasoning illustrates key tenets of rationalism, distinguishing it from other philosophical perspectives that might focus on sensory experience or observable phenomena.